Our Partnership Approach to Advancing Racial Equity and Health Justice
A Partnership Approach to Advancing Racial Equity and Health Justice in Home and Community-Based Services  

When the the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) passed in 2021, it sent a much-needed infusion of funding to state, local and tribal governments reeling from a global pandemic. We’re still seeing the benefits of the law in the form of boosted tax credits available during the 2023 open enrollment, a growing coalition of states cementing the 12-month postpartum Medicaid coverage spearheaded by ARPA and offered to states indefinitely under the omnibus bill, and guaranteed no-cost coverage for COVID-19 vaccinations for insured people.

But, as most advocates know, the design and implementation of policy can be two radically different things. Passage of ARPA was a reason for celebration in the health justice community and beyond, but attention in many places turned to the nitty gritty of ensuring the funds would reach communities who needed them the most.   

Community Engagement and Equity in ARPA HCBS Spending Plans 

State of ARPA Funding

Community Engagement and Equity in ARPA HCBS Spending Plans 

Section 9817 of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) provides states with a temporary ten percentage point increase to the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP), amounting to a total of $12.7 billion in spending increases available. As a result of the increased FMAP and in response to stakeholder feedback, states are taking direct action to address HCBS access and quality issues, many states are prioritizing initiatives that strengthen the direct care workforce.

States have now gotten approval for and published their initial spending plans, which provide important insights into each state’s process in engaging community input and articulating their equity goals. Beyond the specific HCBS policy initiatives of each state plan, this analysis will investigate two aspects of the spending plan development and implementation process: community engagement and equity. While initial spending plans are not an exhaustive representation of all states efforts regarding equity and community representation in HCBS spending, they are important to identify within the parameters of the ARPA spending opportunity.

Learning from Key Informants

Learning from Key Informants

When ARPA was signed into law, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) encouraged state to include robust stakeholder engagement and good faith public notice in their spending plans for the billions in additional funding provided to states and local jurisdictions. While specific requirements remained loose, CMS emphasized engagement beyond facilities, plans, and providers. Specifically, states were encouraged to engage family members, caregivers, aging and disability networks, and the direct support workforce. The extension particularly emphasized the need to address barriers to care and the workforce crisis with home and community-based services.  

Concurrently, states navigated significant and mounting barriers to making progress on equity and community engagement in their ARPA spending plans including aggressive timelines and a lack of infrastructure. However, robust examples of states finding creative and innovative approaches to bolster equity and engagement in home and community-based services still exist. These states represent a diversity of geography, political landscapes, and communities of HCBS beneficiaries. 

To understand the experiences of state policymakers in their HCBS spending through their ARPA allocated dollars, Community Catalyst spoke with a group of national key informants. These key informants have been involved in home and community-based services (HCBS) ARPA spending planning and implementation in various capacities, including advocacy and providing technical assistance to state policymakers.